Loki Season 2 Episode 5’s Secret Post-Credits Breaks Endgame’s Unique MCU Record – Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

Warning: This post contains SPOILERS for Loki season 2 episode 5


Summary

  • Loki season 2 episode 5 delivers a unique post-credits scene that pokes fun at the audience and references a deep Marvel cut.
  • This is the second time in the Marvel Cinematic Universe that an audio-only post-credits scene has been used instead of a traditional stinger.
  • The “loser” message in the post-credits scene not only mocks viewers but also ties into Loki’s destiny as a loser, showcasing his resilience and determination to keep trying.

Loki season 2 episode 5 post-credits scene is a near-unique example in the Marvel Cinematic Universe after 32 movies and 9 different TV series. After dropping a post-credits scene at the end of the first episode in season 2, Tom Hiddleston’s flagship Disney+ show randomly dropped in the season’s second stinger, with a twist.


Loki Season 2 Episode 5 Post-Credits Scene Explained

After the credits roll on Loki season 2 episode 5, with Loki’s game-changing new superpower revealed, and his plan to save the Temporal Loom, the TVA, and all existence unveiled, a stinger calls back to one of the show’s deepest Marvel cuts. In an audio only post-credits gag, a voice shouts “you died, insert a coin, LOSER!” Out of context, it means very little, but Loki season 2 episode 5 set up the joke earlier in the episode.

After Loki brings together OB, Casey, Mobius and B-15 to undo the destruction of the Temporal Loom, he tries to recruit Sylvie, who rejects his offer, but takes him to a bar to invite him to explore exactly why he wants to save the TVA. The opening shot in the bar shows a Zaniac! arcade game, clearly adapted from the same movie Brad Wolfe (Rafael Casal) starred in when he returned to the timeline in episode 2. The audio stinger that forms Loki season 2 episode 5’s post-credits scene is the Game Over message from the same arcade machine.

Why Loki Season 2 Episode 5’s Post-Credits Scene Works So Well

Intriguingly, Loki‘s audio-only post-credits scene is the first time there’s ever been a vocal track played in place of a true stinger, but it’s not the first time the MCU has used an audio post-credits scene. The first time, notably, was at the end of Avengers: Endgame, when the sound of Iron Man forging the Mark 1 armor was played as a touching tribute to Robert Downey Jr’s fallen hero.

In place of a tribute to a dead MCU hero, Loki’s newest post-credits scene instead pokes fun at the audience, playing on the concept of Game Over message culture in video games, and the very idea of waiting until the end of the credits (insulting us all as “losers” for doing so. But also, the “loser” message is a loaded one: Loki confirmed – in a mantra repeated in season 2 episode 5 – that Lokis are destined to lose. The hidden meaning here is that despite dying (and almost dying multiple times), Loki didn’t give up: he may be a loser (and embrace the fact), but a Game Over message is just another opportunity to try again.

New episodes of Loki stream every Thursday on Disney+

[ad_2]
Source link

Armessa Movie News

MCU Blade Writer Responds To Report Of Mahershala Ali’s Hero Being The 4th Lead In The Marvel Movie – Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.

Summary

  • A writer on Blade clarifies that he never saw a version where Mahershala Ali’s character was treated as the fourth lead or the narrative was led by women.
  • According to the screenwriter, Blade was in 99% of the scripts he worked on and was in almost every scene when he was involved.
  • While the writer is unsure about recent developments, he seriously doubts that Ali’s character was ever the fourth lead in any draft.


One of the writers on Mahershala Ali’s Blade reboot is clarifying reports about the upcoming Marvel Cinematic Universe superhero movie having him as a fourth lead in his own film.

It has been less than a day since the initial report emerged, but Michael Starrbury, one of the screenwriters who worked on Blade, has broken his silence on Ali’s character supposedly being treated as the fourth lead in his movie, sharing the following:

Source: Michael Starrbury (1,2)/Twitter

Key Release Dates



[ad_2]
Source link

Armessa Movie News

Jonathan Majors’ MCU Problems Started Earlier Than We Thought as ‘The Marvels’ Suffered a Shocking Exit- Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

To best summarize everything that’s gone on in the Marvel sphere today, I need only name-drop the best multiversal movie not from the MCU: Everything Everywhere All at Once.

Yes, thanks to a shocking exposé on how much Marvel’s 2023 has sucked, to put it plainly, a lot has emerged regarding how the franchise’s Phase Five is shaping up, from Blade undergoing a “bizarre” metamorphosis to The Marvels’ director ditching the production before it was complete.

Jonathan Majors might still be attached to the MCU, but Marvel has been doubting his staying power since Quantumania

Screenshot via Marvel Studios/Disney Plus

One of the biggest revelations to come from the aforementioned shocking exposé, which dropped on our laps courtesy of Variety, is that Marvel does indeed have doubts about continuing with Jonathan Majors as Kang. The surprising thing is that the studio started getting cold feet before the actor’s much-publicized legal issues began. It was apparently the poor performance of Quantumania that left Marvel questioning the intelligence of its planned “Majors-led phase.” Given that execs have been ruminating on this for three-quarters of a year now, it’s curious that Majors remains the key figure in the Multiverse Saga.

The Marvels director Nia DaCosta concerned Marvel when she jumped ship from the movie during post-production

the marvels
Image via Marvel Studios

Pity The Marvels. Its theatrical release this November has been overshadowed by bad news and more bad news. In the latest unencouraging update, we’ve discovered that director Nia DaCosta went and upped sticks before the film had even been completed. Per Variety, the Candyman filmmaker ditched the project during post-production in order to begin work on drama film Hedda, starring Marvel’s own Tessa Thompson. As one inside source succinctly put it, “If you’re directing a $250 million movie, it’s kind of weird for the director to leave with a few months to go.”

Blade making its two-time Oscar-winning star the “fourth lead” proves it might need to be staked for its own good

Wesley Snipes as Blade in the movie of the same name.
via New Line Cinema

What’s going on with Blade? That’s such a good question, as it seems not even Marvel knows the answer to that. It’s an open secret that the reboot of Wesley Snipes’ Daywalker has been plagued with something more deadly than vampires — namely, creative differences — ever since its announcement in 2019, but now we’re learning just how far astray Marvel has gone with this promising project. One script got so focused on other characters that Mahershala Ali’s hero was described as “the fourth lead.” If a lucrative two-time Oscar winner like Ali is being lost in the mix like that, then maybe it would be best if Blade was put out of its misery after all.

As Kevin Feige — not to be confused with K.E.V.I.N. the robot — gets blamed for She-Hulk‘s shoddy CGI, don’t miss out on the next batch of Marvel updates, lest you become green with envy.

[ad_2]
Source link

– Armessa Movie News

Marvel Finally Corrects What the MCU Got Wrong About Nick Fury – Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

Summary

  • The comics are correcting the MCU’s portrayal of Nick Fury and reminding fans that he was the true leader of the Howling Commandos, not Captain America.
  • Nick Fury’s impact on the team is highlighted as Captain America is hesitant to take over even temporarily, showing how much the team reveres Fury’s leadership.
  • The comic emphasizes how different the team operates without Fury, with in-fighting and a lack of cohesion, demonstrating his essential role in both the team’s dynamics and the narrative.


Warning: Spoilers for CapWolf & the Howling Commandos #1!The comics are getting around to correcting what the MCU got wrong about Nick Fury in regard to the Howling Commandos. It’s common to see the Marvel Cinematic Universe occasionally take onscreen liberties when adapting the comics that came before it. One of those liberties was establishing that Steve Rogers led the Howling Commandos during the 1940s when, in the comics, they were Nick Fury’s team.

The comics have decided to remind fans who the Commandos truly belong to in CapWolf & the Howling Commandos #1 by Stephanie Phillips, Carlos Magno, Espen Grundetjern, and VC’s Travis Lanham. The issue opens in 1942-era France as the Commandos are interlocked in a battle against the Nazis that ends with Sergeant Fury sustaining a serious injury.

It’s made clear that Fury is the leader of the team, with Cap only taking over as a temporary alternate under Fury’s orders.

Related: Stan Lee Hated One Major Nick Fury Retcon


Nick Fury Leads the Howling Commandos

Nick Fury talks Captain America into being the alternate leader of the Howling Commandos-1

The Howling Commandos were a World War II-era strike force unit that debuted in 1964’s Sgt. Fury and his Howling Commandos by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby. The original iteration of the team was introduced as an extension of the United States Army Rangers. Over the years, their lore would either evolve or be twisted entirely, but one remaining constant is that Nick Fury would be portrayed as the leader of the team in some shape or form. The Marvel Cinematic Universe would suggest otherwise on the big screen, but the comics are reminding now reminding fans of the impact that the original Nick Fury Sr. had on the group, long before his more recent retirement.

Nick Fury’s Impact on the Howling Commandos

Nick Fury talks Captain America into being the alternate leader of the Howling Commandos-2

The fact that Captain America is so hesitant and reluctant to lead the Howling Commandos in Fury’s place, even on a temporary basis, really highlights what kind of impact the future S.H.I.E.L.D. director has on the team. In the mind of Cap and (as readers see later) other members, the Howling Commandos are unequivocally Nick Fury’s team. In their view, not even Captain America has the right to take over from him even on a brief basis. Readers will quickly see how drastically different a Howling Commandos unit is without Nick Fury.

Whereas the team led by Fury runs smoothly during the opening battle, the Howling Commandos under Cap can’t even get on the same page before the mission begins. The plane ride to the mission is overshadowed by in-fighting among the members, including Dum Dum Dugan, who takes umbrage with someone else trying to lead Fury’s team, calling Captain America “a gimmick with some special abilities” that’s bound to get them all killed. While the MCU tries to tell the Howling Commandos story without Nick Fury, the comics reiterate just how essential he is to the team both in-universe and narratively.

CapWolf & the Howling Commandos #1 is available now from Marvel Comics.

[ad_2]
Source link

Armessa Movie News

Will Marvel’s ‘Blade’ Reboot Have The Smallest Budget In MCU History?- Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

Anyone still hyped over the Blade reboot coming from Marvel despite its troubled production had better sit down to read this because the news isn’t about to get much better.

If how many times the movie has been delayed and all of the issues that keep plaguing production aren’t enough to make you cry the film’s rumored budget is bound to do the trick. Guess what Variety reports the rumored budget for the movie will be? Did you guess less than $100 million because I certainly wouldn’t have.

An optimistic person would suggest this is Marvel simply pulling back on their spending and focusing on trying to tell good stories — Iron Man only had a budget of $140 million and it essentially launched the MCU, right? That optimistic person lacks the context for just how much chaos is rumored to be taking place behind the scenes at Marvel Studios.

via Marvel

Just ignoring the fact that Marvel seemed to be considering dropping Jonathon Majors even before his ongoing controversy began, it seems not even the director of The Marvels has faith in what is supposed to be the next big blockbuster for the MCU. That movie at least at least had a budget of $250 million but Nia DaCosta still reportedly abandoned the movie in post production to instead go work on her next film, a serious red flag that can’t be ignored. Oh yeah, and did I mention that Marvel floated the “brilliant” idea to not even have Blade be the main star in his own film?

To give Marvel a bit of credit, Oscar-nominated writer Michael Green has been brought on to work on the script for the film and he did make movie magic with Logan on a budget of $97 million. But it’s hard to feel like Marvel has faith in Blade when even that crummy spin-off of Jim Carry’s Bruce Almighty — that I’m positive you’ll be searching the name of after reading this because you can’t even remember the title — had a $175 million budget.

When even fans are questioning if it’s actually worth bringing Blade back, it’s reasonable to speculate that the studio just doesn’t care enough about the movie but doesn’t want the scandal of simply cancelling it and using it as a tax write-off like Warner Brothers did with Batgirl.

Blade is currently set to release in 2025, if it ever sees the light of day at all.

[ad_2]
Source link

– Armessa Movie News

‘Loki’ Skipping Ahead To Set Up 2 Multiversal MCU Movies Forces ‘The Marvels’ To Spill Its Biggest Secrets To Stay Relevant- Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

To do my best Rod Serling impression for a moment… Imagine, if you will, the various heroes of the MCU’s Multiverse Saga as high school kids in the cafeteria. By the sounds of it, Tom Hiddleston’s Loki has found himself a seat at the popular table with both the Avengers (the jocks, obviously) and Deadpool (the cool weird kid). On the other hand, Brie Larson and The Marvels trio appear to be isolated on their own table, next to that quiet kid that nobody remembers (Thunderbolts). But, maybe, just maybe, Carol, Monica, and Monica have got some new powerful pals on the way…

Multiverse Saga rumors tease Loki is teaming up with Deadpool 3 to set up Avengers: Secret Wars

Screengrab via Marvel Studios/Disney Plus

Loki season 2’s mid-season trailer promises we “won’t believe what’s coming” next, but thanks to some leaked intel we might be able to make a shrewd guess. According to the latest goss, the TVA will return in Deadpool 3 before playing a key role in Avengers: Secret Wars. While this is exciting to hear, it’s not exactly doing much to boost hype for the incoming The Marvels, which has already been suffering from a dangerous level of apathy from audiences ahead of its release. Sure, not every new Marvel thing has to set up the next thing, but Loki season 2 teeing up The Marvels instead of DP3, would’ve been nice. As it is, it looks like The Marvels has been forced to play its final hand.

The Marvels fights back by teasing its own interdimensional crossover that could crack open the MCU (or not)

Close-up shot of Brie Larson as Captain Marvel in 'The Marvels'
Image via Marvel Studios

With just 10 days to go until Brie Larson’s Carol Danvers blasts back onto our screens, Marvel has apparently decided it needs to pull the rip chord amid weaker-than-expected box office projections (when a dirt-cheap horror flick like Five Nights at Freddys is in danger of outperforming a Marvel film, something’s up). The latest promo seems to confirm that the movie will feature some surprise multiversal flavoring and collide with another reality. Even if my personal theory, that it’s simply the Noor Dimension from Ms. Marvel, plays out, this is nonetheless a clever tactic from the studio to ramp up excitement. We’ll see if it makes a difference come Nov. 10.

Brace yourselves, but the latest Blade update is actually good news for a change

Blade
Photo via Marvel Studios

We needed some kind of encouraging update about the horror side of the MCU this Halloween and, maybe because the universe owes us one after screwing over Marvel’s 2024 slate, that’s exactly what we’ve got. Although we’ve got used to the eternally tormented Blade facing bad news after bad news, a recent rumor that it was in “serious jeopardy” of being canned has been quashed before it could catch fire. While it’s still unlikely to make its scheduled September 2024 release, at least Mahershala Ali’s Daywalker will stake his way onto the scene eventually. Well, unless this was a Halloween trick not a treat…

Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy secretly existing in its own rival MCU is just one small example of the multiversal mayhem that swirls around the Marvel news cycle daily, so don’t go anywhere.

[ad_2]
Source link

– Armessa Movie News

‘Glad this was cut’: The cancelled crossover of MCU Phase 4’s crowning glory with a Marvel movie giant faces a multiversal panning- Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

Spider-Man: No Way Home earned its place as easily the most successful of the MCU’s Multiverse Saga offerings so far with its 3x webslinger team-up, so you’d think a deeper dive into Spidey’s movie history would’ve been even more popular. Well, think again.

As we’ve become aware of before, exactly how Tom Holland’s Peter Parker would encounter Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield’s wall crawlers went through a few different iterations before the storyline we see play out was settled upon. It turns out that one version of the plot even saw Doctor Strange and Peter 1 pulled into Maguire and Garfield’s universes, allowing them to interact with familiar scenes from the Raimi Spider-Man trilogy and The Amazing Spider-Man films.

Concept artist Phil Saunders even revealed his artwork for these scenes, including one piece that inserts Benedict Cumberbatch and Holland’s Peter into Maguire’s battle with Bonesaw from 2002’s Spider-Man. Destined to leave fans drooling at the mouth, right? Actually, they kinda hate it.

Contrary to popular belief, Marvel fans don’t just care about crossovers above all else, as Redditors revealed they were “glad” these scenes were cut as they would’ve “served zero purpose for the story.”

“This would have just [felt] like meaningless fan service,” wrote another fan, not in need of servicing.

For others, this just would’ve awkwardly highlighted the superior visuals of the earlier films in comparison to No Way Home.

Honestly, visiting other familiar universes seems like something we’re bound to do in Avengers: Secret Wars, so hopefully folks respond to that more positively than they do these nixed No Way Home crossovers.

[ad_2]
Source link

– Armessa Movie News

An Action Star Regrets Wasting Their Shot at MCU Stardom on a Bit-Part- Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

You’d think the Marvel Cinematic Universe would be starting to run out of recognizable actors by now after churning out so much film and television content over the last 15 years, but Scott Adkins still remains stung by potentially blowing his shot at a part in the biggest franchise in town on a thankless bit-part in Doctor Strange.

He might be one of the most renowned action heroes of the VOD circuit that’s appeared in several notable Hollywood releases, but his endeavors with Marvel haven’t exactly been stellar. As well as doubling for Ryan Reynolds during the climactic showdown of X-Men Origins: Wolverine, he played the entirely forgettable Lucian in Benedict Cumberbatch’s first solo outing, too.

via Universal

In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Adkins reflected on his short-lived association with the MCU, and he didn’t mince his words; “Did I really want to blow my load on that? No, I don’t think so.” Unfortunately, he’s got a lot of fans out there who would wholeheartedly agree.

To be fair, the likes of Gemma Chan, Laura Haddock, Michelle Yeoh, Nathan Fillion, and Tony Curran have played at least two canonical MCU characters, so there’s no reason why Adkins couldn’t follow suit. On the other side of the coin, he seems less enthusiastic about entering the world of comic book behemoth than he once did, so maybe he’s made peace with the fact Doctor Strange was the be-all and end-all.

He wasn’t exactly the first talent to be wasted by Marvel Studios, and he won’t be the last, either.

[ad_2]
Source link

– Armessa Movie News

Josh Hutcherson’s Spider-Man Audition Video Resurfacing Sparks Calls For MCU Multiverse Casting – Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

An audition video of Josh Hutcherson as Spider-Man has resurfaced, sparking calls for a multiversal appearance from the actor in the MCU.

This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.

Summary

  • Josh Hutcherson’s audition video for Spider-Man has resurfaced, sparking speculation about his potential role in the MCU amid the concept of the multiverse.
  • Hutcherson’s success in the Blumhouse adaptation of Five Nights at Freddy’s has brought attention to his Hollywood past, including his audition for Peter Parker in The Amazing Spider-Man.
  • The audition video shows Hutcherson performing a stunt test where Peter Parker fights off bullies, leading fans to call for him to revisit the role that ultimately went to Andrew Garfield.


An audition video of Josh Hutcherson as Spider-Man has resurfaced online, leading many to wonder if a role in the MCU could await through the concept of the multiverse. Given that Hutcherson is the star of the highly successful Blumhouse adaptation of Five Nights at Freddy’s, the actor is currently in the pop-culture spotlight. This has led several aspects of his Hollywood past to resurface from his compelling turn as Peeta Mellark in The Hunger Games to a period in which he flirted with becoming Marvel’s iconic Web-Slinger.

One such video has appeared online via Blurayangel which highlights a long-forgotten video of Hutcherson auditioning for the role of Peter Parker. The video comes from the early 2012’s when director Marc Webb was searching for an actor for what became 2012’s The Amazing Spider-Man. The video shows Hutcherson engaging in a stunt test involving Peter Parker fighting off a group of bullies which, in light of the ever-expanding MCU multiverse, has sparked calls for the actor to revisit the role that eventual went to Andrew Garfield.

Source: Blurayangel

Key Release Dates



[ad_2]
Source link

Armessa Movie News

‘Loki’ Finds Itself in Danger of Ripping off a $2.8 Billion Behemoth as Tom Cruise’s Absence From the MCU Can Be Traced Back to a Disastrously Bad DC Film- Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

It’s been an exciting few days at Marvel following Loki’s brain-busting episode 4 cliffhanger. The fandom continues to fire off compliments on all cylinders and eagerly touts the Disney Plus series as the new savior of the MCU

However, a newly released mid-season promo for the remainder of Loki season 2 has raised doubts over the studio’s originality, especially when viewed through the lens of the MCU’s highest-grossing movie. Speaking of which money — had Hollywood entirely skipped over George Clooney’s worst (and only) outing as the Caped Crusader, one of cinema’s highest-paid actors of all time, Tom Cruise, might have actually graced the superhero studio by now. 

Elsewhere, the box office is experiencing a shocking surge in ticket sales for Five Nights at Freddy’s. So much so that Brie Larson’s second outing as Captain Marvel is feeling more and more like a letdown waiting to happen (box office speaking). 

Loki’s ingenuity is starting to smell a lot like Avengers: Endgame

Image via Marvel Studios/Disney Plus

When a movie or TV show uses time travel as a narrative device, it’s hard to veer from the genre’s most obvious trope i.e. going back in time to fix the present day. Loki hasn’t followed that structure exactly, but it has used a variation of it, what with Loki pruning himself. In the mid-season trailer, Loki appears to be the only person still in possession of his memory while Mobius, Casey, and everyone else at the TVA are living the variant versions of their lives. Should the final two episodes end with Loki wrangling his friends back to the TVA, fixing his time-slipping, and solving the Temporal Loom’s overcapacity problem in one fell swoop, it’ll essentially be a regurgitated version of Avengers: Endgame, which is to say Marvel has reached the end of its rope in terms of originality. 

The MCU could’ve had Tom Cruise but Batman & Robin had to go and ruin it

tom cruise
Image via Tom Cruise/X/Twitter

Before the MCU was a thing — before even Blade, X-Men, or Spider-Man turned the world onto superhero films — Tom Cruise’s price tag to become Iron Man on the silver screen was too risky of an investment for 20th Century Fox to gamble on, especially given the dismal reception to 1997’s Batman & Robin. Cruise’s “asking fee at the time was more than even a profitable studio like Fox was willing to risk on an untested superhero property,” notes MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios, an in-depth book documenting the MCU’s assent to worldwide box office domination. Now that the MCU is the most successful film franchise of all time, however, Cruise’s asking price is but a quarter between the cushions of a couch for Marvel, and what better place to make the bygone dream a reality than a multiversal playground wherein variant versions of our beloved superheroes can run amok right beside each other. Just sayin’. Your move, as always, Marvel. 

The Marvels could become the next Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny if Five Nights at Freddy’s has anything to say about it

Brie Larson as Carol Danvers in 'The Marvels '
Screengrab via Marvel Studios

The Marvels and Five Nights at Freddy’s couldn’t be more opposite, but so were Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny and that small film starring Jim Caviezel from earlier this year, Sound of Freedom. The latter two found themselves lumped into conversation due to Sound of Freedom’s modest budget ($14.5 million) and eventual box office profit ($217.3 million) compared to Dial of Destiny’s bloated budget ($300 million) and eventually box office loss ($383 million). 

The Marvels has a budget of around $275 million whereas Five Nights at Freddy’s invested only $20 million. We don’t know how The Marvels will perform yet, but FNaF has already made $132 million globally within just 72 hours; The Marvels will need to climb higher, further, faster to compete against the video game adaptation given that the Brie Larson film is expected to perform 50% worse than it’s billion-dollar predecessor Captain Marvel. Still, 50% worse than a $1.1 billion movie is over half a million. If FNaF can beat that, then the MCU might really be in the endgame now. 

[ad_2]
Source link

– Armessa Movie News

Why Tom Cruise Didn’t Play Iron Man In The MCU, Finally Explained – Armessa Movie News

[ad_1]

Speculation about Tom Cruise playing Iron Man in the MCU has run rampant for years, with the actor’s reasoning for passing the role finally revealed.

This article covers a developing story. Continue to check back with us as we will be adding more information as it becomes available.

Summary

  • Tom Cruise was considered for the role of Iron Man but was not chosen because his asking fee at the time was too high for the studio to risk on an untested superhero property.
  • Before Disney acquired the MCU, they did not have the financial backing to hire an A-list star like Cruise, which led to the hiring of Robert Downey Jr. instead.
  • Despite the perceived risks associated with casting Downey Jr., his performance as Iron Man was a huge success for the Marvel Cinematic Universe that has gone above what Cruise may have been able to offer.


Since 2008 and the release of Iron Man, rumors of Tom Cruise playing the titular role have been spread, with the reason behind Robert Downey Jr. taking the role instead finally being revealed 15 years later. It has long been known that Cruise was in the running for the role of Tony Stark upon the MCU’s inception. This even led many to assume Cruise would appear in 2022’s Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness as an Iron Man variant. However, a true reason as to why Cruise did not get the role over Robert Downey Jr. has never been provided.

That said, MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios – a book written by Joanna Robinson, Dave Gonzales, and Gavin Edwards – has finally revealed the reasoning behind Cruise not being a part of the franchise. The book delves deep into the inner workings of the MCU over the last two decades or so, including the reason why Robert Downey Jr. was picked as Iron Man over Cruise:

“Ten years earlier, when the Iron Man rights were at 20th Century Fox, Tom Cruise, then thirty-four, had flirted with the idea of playing Stark… According to Feige, however, Cruise’s asking fee at the time was more than even a profitable studio like Fox was willing to risk on an untested superhero property.”

As it turns out, the absence of Cruise as Tony Stark revolved entirely around a pay dispute. Before the acquisition of the MCU by Disney, the franchise did not have a benefactor willing to provide the money needed to hire an A-list star like Cruise. This led to Downey Jr. being hired who, given his personal issues prior to the release of Iron Man, was less of a cost yet more of a risk than Cruise, a risk that entirely paid off for the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

[ad_2]
Source link

Armessa Movie News

Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Instagram