[ad_1]
Summary
- Astronaut Chris Hadfield confirms the accuracy of gunfire in For All Mankind on the moon, reasoning that the lack of air and oxygen makes bullets more accurate.
- Hadfield discusses how a bullet’s impact on a space suit causing a fire is true to life due to the high oxygen environment inside.
- Despite some inconsistencies, For All Mankind still puts effort into handling its topics and Hadfield’s critiques add depth to the show’s scientific accuracy.
Astronaut Chris Hadfield has confirmed the accuracy of a death in the series For All Mankind. The series follows an alternate reality in which the Soviet Union landed on the moon before the United States and the space race never ended. Each season has taken a time jump that delves further into what a continued competition between the world’s superpowers would look like if they kept striving for the stars.
Ahead of the release of For All Mankind season 4, Hadfield breaks down a scene for Vanity Fair where he is shown a scene in which an American astronaut shoots a Soviet astronaut on the moon.
He discussed how gunfire on the moon is much more accurate as opposed to on Earth, citing the lack of air and oxygen, thus making the bullet shoot straighter and farther. Along with confirming the accuracy of the gunfire in the scene, he went on to explain how the impact of a bullet on a space suit was also true to life:
It’s a hundred percent oxygen inside a spacesuit, so everything burns. We have had a fire inside a spacewalking suit. It was in test at the Johnson Space Center in Houston and even the aluminum was burning inside the suit. Fortunately, there was not a person in the suit. You don’t want any sparks to be even possible inside a hundred percent oxygen environment.
How For All Mankind Holds Up To Scrutiny
While earlier in his review of For All Mankind Hadfield bashed it as “excruciating to watch“, he was impressed with the shooting scene. Hadfield had previously researched how guns would fire on the moon for his fiction thriller, The Apollo Murders. His praise comes not only from the point of view of an astronaut, but also as a storyteller. And compared to the accuracy of movies like Moonfall, For All Mankind has a lot going for it.
Despite calling some of For All Mankind “cartoonish” after only a few episodes, the narrative of the show does at times supersede realistic science. This isn’t the only film in which Hadfield pointed out inconsistencies. Notably, he commended on Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 for the scene that shows Star-Lord floating through space unprotected. Hadfield chalked this up to a viewer’s experience, stating that it would have been done to more entice audiences. Another interesting scenario that Hadfield felt would be accurate if it ever occurred was the concept of someone born in space as shown in The Expanse.
While For All Mankind may not hold up in all aspects, the show has taken an interesting premise and still clearly puts forth an effort in the topics it handles. Hadfield’s critiques do make the show more interesting, especially when he points out the parts that line up with scientific accuracy.
Source: Vanity Fair
[ad_2]
Source link
Armessa Movie News