[ad_1]
Better Call Saul season 1 had a lot of criticisms levied at it, but the series’ ending made these points look absolutely ridiculous in hindsight. Although it is different from Breaking Bad, Better Call Saul lives up to its predecessor in almost every way, being just as big of a critical and commercial success as the original show. While Better Call Saul may have struggled in season 1, the ending proves that those struggles were actually the show’s strengths, making the criticisms invalid.
Better Call Saul is the prequel to Breaking Bad, focusing on Saul Goodman and a variety of other characters from the Breaking Bad universe. Better Call Saul is a constant ticking time bomb of events leading up to Breaking Bad, with viewers knowing how much worse things will get for every character involved over the course of only a few seasons. However, because Better Call Saul takes place so many years before the original show, the first few seasons are a slow-paced legal drama, leading to season 1’s biggest (and most ridiculous) criticism.
Better Call Saul Season 6 Disproved The Biggest Criticisms Of S1
At the time of Better Call Saul season 1, the show was subject to a lot of criticism unfavorably comparing it to Breaking Bad. These critics slammed the first season’s slow pace, focus on courtroom drama, and lack of action. While these are all aspects of the show’s first season, these critics painted them as negatives, but Better Call Saul‘s season 6 risks prove that these points don’t apply to the whole show.
The ending of Better Call Saul is anything but a courtroom drama, with it focusing on the tense plots of Howard Hamlin’s murder, a war between rival drug gangs, and Saul Goodman’s escape to Nebraska. There is plenty of action, such as Lalo’s shootout with Gus and the boxing match between Saul and Howard. The pace of season 6 is anything but slow, with the last few episodes jumping decades at a time. The pacing of Better Call Saul season 6 is even faster than that of Breaking Bad, disproving these major Better Call Saul season 1 criticisms.
Better Call Saul Was Right To Start Slower
While starting slower may have seemed like a bad move at first, Better Call Saul was right to do it. Better Call Saul slowly built up to its massive season 6 crescendo rather than starting out guns blazing, allowing the final season to be so much more impactful. Better Call Saul properly paced its story, allowing for a much better payoff at the end of the show.
On top of that, the slower pace allows Better Call Saul to stand out from Breaking Bad. Breaking Bad is incredibly fast-paced, throwing lots of things at the audience, while Better Call Saul takes its time to slowly build up its story. Rather than just feeling like more of the same, the pace of Better Call Saul allows it to feel unique, turning its strength into a weakness.
[ad_2]
Source link
Armessa Movie News